STOP BOTLEY WEST CAMPAIGN, oxfordshire
STOP BOTLEY WEST CAMPAIGN, oxfordshire
  • HOME
  • DONATE
  • ACT
    • ACT NOW
    • HELP OUT
  • EVENTS
  • NEWS
  • LEARN MORE
    • CURRENT STAGE
    • CONSULTATION
    • ADEQUACY
    • SCOPING REPORT
    • SCOPING RESPONSES
    • THE PROCESS
    • UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS
    • BIODIVERSTIY
    • MEADOWS IN DANGER
    • ARTICLES
  • CONTACTS
    • WHO ARE WE?
    • WHO ARE THEY?
    • CONTACT US
  • More
    • HOME
    • DONATE
    • ACT
      • ACT NOW
      • HELP OUT
    • EVENTS
    • NEWS
    • LEARN MORE
      • CURRENT STAGE
      • CONSULTATION
      • ADEQUACY
      • SCOPING REPORT
      • SCOPING RESPONSES
      • THE PROCESS
      • UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS
      • BIODIVERSTIY
      • MEADOWS IN DANGER
      • ARTICLES
    • CONTACTS
      • WHO ARE WE?
      • WHO ARE THEY?
      • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • DONATE
  • ACT
    • ACT NOW
    • HELP OUT
  • EVENTS
  • NEWS
  • LEARN MORE
    • CURRENT STAGE
    • CONSULTATION
    • ADEQUACY
    • SCOPING REPORT
    • SCOPING RESPONSES
    • THE PROCESS
    • UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS
    • BIODIVERSTIY
    • MEADOWS IN DANGER
    • ARTICLES
  • CONTACTS
    • WHO ARE WE?
    • WHO ARE THEY?
    • CONTACT US

DECISION DELAYED AGAIN - TO 10 NOVEMBER

DECISION DELAYED AGAIN - TO 10 NOVEMBERDECISION DELAYED AGAIN - TO 10 NOVEMBERDECISION DELAYED AGAIN - TO 10 NOVEMBER

Respond by 4 October

July 16 Responses Published

25 More Late Submissions from PVDP

GET REGULAR UPDATES

BOTLEY WEST SOLAR "FARM"

1,400 hectares, 15+ villages affected, 11 km long, 5km wide

Over 2 million solar panels, 110km of security fencing, 35km footpaths overwhelmed

75% on Green Belt, 40% of panel area is best & most versatile (BMV) land

Within the setting of Blenheim Palace and adjacent to many other heritage assets.

Dangerously close to London Oxford Airport

RESPOND BY 4 OCTOBER

The decision by the Secretary of State (SoS) on whether to grant the Development Consent Order (DCO) to PVDP has now been delayed again until 10th November 2026.


We, as interested parties, now have just 3 weeks - until 4 October to send in further responses.  Many of you will feel angry that this has happened when you have already responded so many times before and expected to have done this for the last time. It is unreasonable to ask you to respond yet again.


Nevertheless, we are asking you to send a brief letter (see below) to show your continuing support for the SBW campaign and the unresolved concerns you still have about Botley West.


If you have time to add a paragraph or two of your own to make it more personal, that would be especially valuable but even the pro forma on its own will be fine.


Send your letter to BotleyWestSolar@planninginspectorate.gov.uk


Text of letter to cut and paste:


Dear Secretary of State


Botley West Solar Farm: EN010147


I am disappointed that the Applicant’s late submissions have been accepted causing further delay in the decision for Botley West and requesting yet another response from Interested Parties.


I am a supporter of the Stop Botley West campaign and fully endorse the comprehensive SBW submission of 16 July [C2-161]. I am concerned that despite these new proposals the Application is still irretrievably flawed. Too many questions remain unanswered and the Applicant seeks to defer too many important decisions until after any development consent is granted when they will be beyond public scrutiny and challenge.


Add any additional comments here - or delete this line


I respectfully request the Secretary of State to refuse outright the grant of a DCO for this Application.


Name: _____________________________________________

Interested Party Registration No: _______________ (delete if you can’t find this!)



ISSUES YOU MAY WISH TO ADD TO YOUR LETTER

1. Areas of concern posed by the new submissions

  • The principal concern is the introduction of an “outline Residential Visual Amenity Plan” (oRAP) [C1-108] and new Masterplan revision 5 [C1-111] in which the default buffer now offered and drawn is 100m (compared with the 250m default recommended by Examiners and previously shown in the Applicant’s 9 June masterplan revision 4 [C1-051] “with additional offsets up to 250m applied where needed”. It’s not clear how this “need” would be assessed post consent when it will be beyond public scrutiny.
  • The Applicant’s amended Schedule 2, requirement 15 in the DCO states that the 100m buffer minimum will be used as “the starting point which has been amended to require the final plan to be substantially in accordance with this outline plan.” This implies that very few buffers will be increased to anything near 250m. This contradicts the Applicant’s 9 June submissions in which the starting point was the 250m maximum to be adjusted downwards in some cases. This is a significant and unjustified change compared to the Applicant’s submissions of 9 June in which the Applicant admitted that the Installation would still be viable, albeit marginally, with a panel area using a 250m buffer.

2. Unresolved issues still not addressed. These include:

  1. Red-line Boundary. At least 300 hectares of land stated now by the Applicant not to be used for panels. The certainty that this land won’t be used for panels should be secured by moving the red-line boundary. It can then be returned to agricultural use
  2. Heritage and Landscape. The Landscape Character Assessment requested by ICOMOS has not been undertaken and issues raised by ICOMOS remain unresolved.
  3. National Grid Substation. Location still not decided, no planning Application yet submitted by NGET who say earliest connection date is Winter 2031. No clause in DCO to say BWSF build cannot start until substation has planning consent.
  4. Decommissioning fund. ExA recommended DCO should ensure a decommissioning fund (as well as a plan) is in place before construction starts. Not done.
  5. Viability. The Applicant has not justified its claim for a 935MW minimum ‘economically viable’ size for BWSF and rejected Oxfordshire Host Authority’s proposals for a smaller installation.
  6. Flood Risk. No further panel pull-back to mitigate flood risk despite well evidenced responses from Cassington and Cumnor Parish Councils and their Hydrology Experts. See REP7-068, REP7-077, C2-162 and C2-169
  7. Ecology and Bio-diversity net Gain. Arboricultural impact assessment still not done. Skylark compensation strategy unworkable.
  8. Special Site of Scientific Interest (SSSI). A large part of the central site is now on the list of SSSI designation proposed development, named The Three Rivers potential SSSI site based on the presence of the rivers and river valleys in the region. This needs to be considered.
  9. Community food growing - no further mention. These areas should be removed from the red-line boundary. See REP5-072, REP5-093 and REP6-076
  10. Trainee pilot safety is at risk with the current panel layout. Further panel removal near the airport is essential. See C2-210 and C2-176
  11. Proposed cycle path along Lower Rd still shown on Masterplan despite verbal agreement to remove from the Application (during the Examiners’ Site Inspection on 7 October 2025).
  12. Minerals and Waste. Oxford County Council (OCC) are still in disagreement with the Applicant regarding these issues.
  13. Acquisition of roadside verges. This is another unresolved disagreement between the Applicant and the OCC

16 JULY DEADLINE SUBMISSIONS PUBLISHED

Documents submitted for 16 July deadline were published on 2 September.


Huge thanks to over 200 of you who answered the call and sent in submissions. Your detailed and well argued responses and letters to the Secretary of State are very helpful in showing the strength and depth of feeling still in evidence in the community after 4 years of consultations!


The detailed submission from StopBotleyWest covered all the questions asked in the Secretary of State’s April letter to the Applicant (PVDP) and responded to PVDP’s answers submitted at their 9 June deadline. It’s over 150 pages long but the key points are in the Cover letter and Executive Summary on the first 10 pages in case you can’t face reading it all!


You can read the SBW submission here


Other significant submissions include:

  • Oxford Host Authorities (OHA) here and here
  • Oxford Airport Flight Training Companies here and here

LATE SUBMISSIONS FROM PVDP ACCEPTED

 PVDP made 25 late submissions on 16 July (well past their 9 June deadline) which, though heavily criticised by SoS, have been accepted for consideration and were published on 4 September. We are invited to respond - yet again!


The SoS letter (read it here) is highly critical of PVDP and blames them for this further extension!


The new submissions include a few significant changes (generally not for the better) but many other issues remain unresolved. Read a list and details of these in the section linked to RESPOND BY 4 OCTOBER 2026

STOP BOTLEY WEST MEDIA SUMMARY

 Throughout the Stop Botley West campaign, our media strategy has been to ensure that influential national and local media are kept up to date with the information and evidence that we have gathered.


In the last three years, media including the Sunday Times, The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, the Daily Mail, the Guardian, Private Eye, BBC TV and Radio, ITV, Oxford Mail and Times and Witney Gazette have reported on different aspects of the proposed Botley West development.


Their coverage has focused on the distinctive issues and concerns that relate specifically to the scale, location and ownership of the proposed Botley West solar power station. These include:


  • Potential risks to the Blenheim Palace protected UNESCO World Heritage Site status and environment
  • Long-term damage to good quality and productive farmland managed and improved by tenant farmers
  • Threats to the sustainability of the area’s rich biodiversity
  • Enhanced flood risk to already vulnerable communities such as Cassington
  • Investigations into the financial and corporate integrity and track record of PVDP, the proposed developer, and its partnership with Blenheim Estate.


A consistent concern has been the very real risk of fatal accidents faced by the thousands of trainee pilots from London Oxford Airport who regularly overfly the proposed Botley West site. In the past, a number of pilots have used neighbouring fields for emergency landings after engine failure. The seriousness of these concerns was highlighted by a recent Oxford Mail news story citing evidence submitted by two flying schools who use London Oxford Airport – see here

Community Impact Report

Our key objections

It is vast

Solar is least efficient

Loss of arable farmland

  Nowhere in the world has a ground mounted solar farm this vast (bigger than Heathrow) been built so near to human habitation (11,000 homes within 1.5km) and for very good health and safety reasons (learn more).

Loss of arable farmland

Solar is least efficient

Loss of arable farmland

  It would remove thousands of tons of crops each year at a time of growing concern about food security. 250,000 hectares of unused, south-facing commercial roofs in the UK could be used instead (learn more).

Solar is least efficient

Solar is least efficient

No natural biodiversity gains

  There are many better ways to produce green energy. Offshore wind is up to 51% efficient compared with solar panels less than 22% (learn more).

No natural biodiversity gains

Carbon debt maybe never repaid

No natural biodiversity gains

  There will be no natural gains for wildlife or the environment. There will be loss of wildlife habitat, increased risk of flooding and 51 miles of 8ft high animal proof security fencing restricting movement (learn more).

Carbon debt maybe never repaid

Carbon debt maybe never repaid

Carbon debt maybe never repaid

  Botley West may never pay back the carbon debt it accumulates in the construction, transportation and decommissioning of panels. There is a huge amount of carbon generated in all these operations (learn more).

It is in a special place

Carbon debt maybe never repaid

Carbon debt maybe never repaid

  The current plans show Botley West SF could encroach within 100m of Blenheim Palace boundary wall and threaten its UNESCO World Heritage Site status. Historic sites like Sansom’s Platt in Wootton and Churchill’s grave in Bladon Churchyard would also be overwhelmed (learn more). 

Disregards Oxford's greenbelt

Disregards Oxford's greenbelt

  75% of the proposed site is on greenbelt land which should be protected. It would industrialise the countryside for 40 years and may never be returned to agricultural use  (learn more).

Visual impact unprecedented

Disregards Oxford's greenbelt

  Solar Panels will be highly visible at ground level from roads and footpaths for visitors and residents alike over an 11 by 3 mile area, It cannot be ‘landscaped to only be seen through gaps in the hedges’ as claimed  (learn more).

Who benefits?

Who benefits?

  The main financial beneficiaries of this industrialisation of the countryside are overseas developers PVDP (of dubious pedigree) and landowners Blenheim Estate (NOT the Palace itself) (learn more).

what are the right renewables?

The Local Solution


Solar energy should be used specifically to meet local demands and directly benefit local communities, not big landowners and overseas companies.

  1. Solar panels should be on house, office and warehouse roofs throughout Oxfordshire
  2. Solar panels should be situated on brown field sites (Didcot Power Station, for example, which is already linked to the Grid).
  3. Community solar farms should be encouraged. These are funded, designed and run directly under community control, and service just the community resulting in benefits to everyone’s electric bills.


And there are other imaginative means of providing green energy. These are just four: 

  • Smaller scaled wind turbines can be used locally to serve a community.
  • France has designed trees whose ‘leaves’ turn in the wind. One tree can provide an estimated 40% of the annual electricity for a house.
  • Switzerland is putting solar panels between the rails of their entire railway network.
  • In America, transparent solar ‘windows’ can, experts believe, power 40% of America


The National Solution


As well as a national rollout of these local solutions we have offshore windpower which offers peak electricity in the dark winter months when the UK most needs energy and when solar panels are least efficient. And, of-course, there are other offshore energy sources – wave power, tidal power etc already in use.


Finally, Andrew Tettenborn, Professor of Law at Swansea Law School sums it up in the Spectator: “In the dash for Green Energy “corporate capital is being handed a heaven- sent opportunity at the expense of you, me and the country we live in at least as regards solar power (Government policy) is not working for the benefit of the people ……..

but instead seems to favour a more international clientele.”


All of this means we don’t need old fashioned, large scale, inefficient solar ‘farms’.

Connect With Us

Copyright © 2024 STOP BOTLEY WEST CAMPAIGN, OXFORDSHIRE - All Rights Reserved.

Company Number: 15879781

Powered by

  • Privacy Policy

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept

Stay informed

Welcome! Share your contact details to receive regular email updates on the Botley West proposal

GET REGULAR UPDATES